Product roadmap
Product roadmap
- Status
- Active
- Quarter
- Q2
TableBoard
| Name | Status | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise SSO | Must ship | Q2 commit |
| Sync | Works | One box |
| Admin polish | Backlog | — |
AI SquadsProduct Squad
Stop holding the product in your head.
A signal lands — meeting note, X post, customer pain. Product Squad files it on the feature it belongs to, sharpens the judgment, and keeps what's critical vs parked current.
Still re-authing every morning just to pull Linear. Killing me.
ConnectorsLive
OAuth rails for Linear, Slack, and the rest of the stack
P2P1
InsightsSources
Critical
- Silent session restore — no morning re-auth UINew
- One settings rail for all connected apps
Ideas
- Remember last connected workspace on return
- Bulk revoke from a single security page
Truth gap
Product truth is scattered. One model stays current.
Notion, Slack, Linear, PostHog each hold a partial story. The living model fuses them — and proposes the map fix.
Jordan2d
Enterprise keeps asking for bulk SSO again…
Sync timeouts on connector re-auth
In ProgressHigh
Connector re-auth fails
+18% WoWNot on the roadmap
IdentitySSO not real yet
SyncTwo jobs fused
ConnectorsRe-auth pressure
AdminStale surface
Map proposal · Split
SyncReliability + Connectors
Telemetry + delivery show two jobs under one name
Build Next · not backlog
Bets with evidence. Holds when the door is one-way.
Acme · illustrativeSignals · 09:02
Decision thread47 scattered signals47 signals → 3 bets → 1 held → graded
01 · Route before judging
Chores route. Bets earn judgment.
- CustomerBulk SSO — again→ judgment
- TelemetryConnector adoption repeats→ judgment
- StrategySMB-first→ judgment
- DeliverySync carries two jobs→ judgment
- SupportOAuth copy regression→ Tasks
02 · Assemble
One product reality, locked.
Product context packcurrent · versioned
3 betsfrom 47 signals
What the loud ask must survive.
- CapabilitiesSync · connectors · identity
- StrategySMB-first · #4021
- OutcomesAdoption + reliability
03 · Attack the obvious
Loud stops winning by default.
Enterprise SSO pull-forwardcontested
- Strategy · #4021 SMB-first
- Telemetry · connectors, not SSO
04 · Rank · evidence shown
One bet advances. One door stays held.
- 01Split Sync into Reliability + ConnectorsEvidence + strategy alignedBuild next
- Telemetry · connectors +18%
- Delivery · Sync carries two jobs
- Strategy · SMB-first #4021
- 02Activation feedback loopNeeds deeper cut
- Support · incomplete funnels
- Telemetry · drop at invite
- 03Enterprise SSO pull-forwardHeld · #4021 one-way doorHold
- Counter · strategy SMB-first
- Telemetry · connectors, not SSO
05 · Hand off
Packet leaves with the why.
Typed handoff · build
Split Sync → Reliability + Connectors
Connector adoption pressure + reliability debt share one boundary.
Declared outcomeSetup success +15 pts · p95 sync error −30%
TasksEngineeringExternal agent
- 0acceptance criteria
- 0connector timeout ↓%
- 0reliability days green
Delivery verified · product impact still open
06 · Grade
You get the grade.
Split Sync · 21 days post-releaseimproved
baselineSetup success 61%
observed74%target +15 pts
Next ranking weights outcome confidence higher
One answer · every surface
Same answer in Slack. Same constraints in the agent.
product
12 members · Product bot
Y
you10:41 AM
What should we build next, and why not SSO?
Product SquadApp10:41 AM
Split Sync into Reliability + Connectors. Connector demand repeats; SSO stays held on Decision #4021.
Telemetry · connector adoption
Delivery · shared sync boundary
Strategy · Decision #4021
Held · Enterprise SSO
Message #product
Claude
Sonnet · product context
product-primerfrom HiveBase
- build_next
- Split Sync → Reliability + Connectors
- why
- Demand · delivery boundary · strategy
- held
- Enterprise SSO · founder decide
- pack
- current · evidence-linked
hivebase://context/product-primer
What should we build next, and why not SSO?
Split Sync into Reliability + Connectors. Connector demand repeats; SSO stays held on Decision #4021.
TelemetryDeliveryStrategyHeld
Reply to Claude…
product
12 members · Product bot
Y
you10:41 AM
Will splitting Sync improve retention?
Product SquadApp10:41 AM
Needs deeper telemetry. Evidence supports the connector bet — not a measured retention effect.
Known · connector + reliability
Unknown · retention causality
Next · cohort after window
Boundary · do not invent the metric
Product would define the cohort before claiming retention.
Message #product
Claude
Sonnet · product context
product-primer…
- claim
- retention lift · not established
- known
- connector adoption observable
- next
- define cohort + window first
- held
- no retention claim yet
hivebase://context/product-primer
Will splitting Sync improve retention?
Needs deeper telemetry. Evidence supports the connector bet — not a measured retention effect.
KnownUnknownNextBoundary
Reply to Claude…
Same recommendation. Same constraints. Same why.
Live product model
How truth stays real as agents ship.
live · pack sealed
SStrategy
IdentityC+
SyncB
ConnectorsB−
BillingA−
AdminD
Shipped is not done
Agents get the bet. You get the grade.
Split Sync · 21 days post-release
baseline
Setup success 61%
observed
74%
target +15 pts
improved
Next ranking weights outcome confidence higher
Autonomy by blast radius
It did the reasoning you don’t have time for.It held the call only you should make.
ingestmaprank
Reversible receiptProduct Map split proposal created
pricingpromises
HELD BOUNDARY
Enterprise SSO pull-forward
Founder decide · no action executed
correctgrade
Product impact
Observation window open
No outcome claimed before evidence
One loop · different thresholdsAutonomy changes with the team.
Proposal-moment review
Founder decides the one-way doorExplicit decide gates
Named owner decides and the team sees whyHonest fit
A judgment layer —not another roadmap.
Earns its keep
- You re-explain product to every AI and hire.
- Evidence lives across Slack, analytics, and delivery.
- Judgment — not ticket creation — is the bottleneck.
May add little
Context already lives cleanly in one Linear-and-GitHub flow.
FAQ
The product, without the theater.
What does Product Squad actually do?
It absorbs product-relevant volume — research, feature sparks, Slack, meetings, telemetry — into a living product model, updates idea importance and shape, challenges and ranks Build Next bets with evidence, holds one-way doors for you, serves the same judgment to agents, and grades whether shipped work moved the declared metric. Not backlog management: the product brain you shouldn't have to keep only in your head.
Is this another roadmap or feedback board?
No. Roadmaps and boards stay where they are. Product Squad reconciles them against code and live signals, then prepares Build Next bets and holds — judgment, not a prettier ticket list.
Why doesn’t every signal go through the judgment loop?
Bets need synthesis, challenge, and outcome verification. Clear bugs and mechanical follow-ups route to Tasks or Engineering. Chores through judgment become a toll booth; bets that skip it become a wishlist.
Does it replace our roadmap or project-management tool?
No. Linear, Productboard, analytics, and support stay authoritative. Product Squad connects their evidence, records judgment between them, and distributes that context to humans and agents.
Can external agents use the same Product context?
Yes. Agents get a typed context primer and handoff packet with the same capabilities, strategy, evidence, constraints, and held decisions the team sees.
How does outcome grading work?
Every handoff declares metric, baseline, target, and window. After release, Product grades improved / regressed / inconclusive / learning. Grades calibrate the next ranking. Demos use fictional Acme numbers.
What can run without approval?
Ingest, reversible map work, context assembly, challenge, rank, and draft handoffs can run. Pricing, public roadmap, and other one-way doors stay held until a human decides.
When does HiveBase add little?
If product context already lives cleanly in one Linear-and-GitHub flow and agents rarely cross tools, Product Squad may add limited value.